11+ Study Hacks Trending on TikTok and Instagram: Which Ones the Research Actually Backs
Your child has probably seen at least one "study with me" video, a colour-coded revision timetable, or a #studytok flashcard hack this term. Some of what goes viral under study content is genuinely backed by decades of learning-science research. A lot of it is aesthetically satisfying and close to useless. Here's how the actual trending techniques stack up, checked against the psychology literature rather than the like count.
Short answer: two viral #studytok formats are genuinely backed by research — the "blurting"/brain-dump method (retrieval practice) and spaced repetition flashcard apps. Aesthetic highlighting and rewriting notes look satisfying but are rated low utility. Pomodoro timers and study-with-me videos help focus and motivation, not learning itself.
Quick summary
Quick take:
- The single biggest evidence-backed swap: replace rereading notes with self-testing from memory.
- Spacing practice across several short sessions beats one long cramming session, even at the same total time.
- A technique looking satisfying on video is not the same as it working — the two trends are only loosely related.
The research this is checked against
In 2013, cognitive psychologists John Dunlosky, Katherine Rawson, Elizabeth Marsh, Mitchell Nathan and Daniel Willingham published a major review in Psychological Science in the Public Interest, rating ten common learning techniques on how well the evidence supports them across different subjects, ages and test types. Five techniques — summarisation, highlighting/underlining, the keyword mnemonic, imagery for text, and rereading — were rated low utility despite being some of the most commonly used study methods by students. Two techniques — practice testing and distributed (spaced) practice — were rated high utility, meaning the benefit is well-supported and generalises broadly.
Trending technique 1: aesthetic highlighting and rewritten colour-coded notes
What's viral about it: beautifully rewritten, colour-coded notes are a huge genre on study social media — satisfying to watch, satisfying to make.
What the research says: highlighting and rereading are both rated low utility. The act of copying out or highlighting information can create a false sense of familiarity ("I recognise this, so I must know it") without building the retrieval strength that actually predicts exam performance.
Trending technique 2: the "blurting method" / brain dump
What's viral about it: close the book, write down everything you remember on a blank page, then check what you missed — a genuinely popular #studytok format.
What the research says: this is, in substance, practice testing / retrieval practice — one of the two techniques Dunlosky et al. rated high utility. Forcing recall from memory (rather than recognising information on a page) is what builds durable, exam-ready knowledge.
Trending technique 3: spaced repetition apps
What's viral about it: flashcard apps that resurface a card just as you're about to forget it, popularised on study social media under #spacedrepetition.
What the research says: this is distributed practice, the other high-utility technique — spreading study sessions out over time consistently outperforms cramming the same total hours into one sitting, and the effect holds up well for vocabulary, facts and reasoning-style content typical of 11+ prep.
Trending technique 4: Pomodoro timers and "study with me" videos
What's viral about it: 25-minutes-on, 5-minutes-off timers, and hours-long silent "study with me" livestreams for ambient accountability.
What the research says: neither is one of the ten techniques Dunlosky et al. evaluated directly — they're focus and motivation tools, not learning techniques in themselves. They can genuinely help a child actually sit down and start (which matters), but a well-structured Pomodoro session spent purely rereading notes still delivers a rereading session's worth of learning, not more.
| Trending technique | Research rating |
|---|---|
| Aesthetic highlighting / colour-coded rewriting | Low utility |
| Blurting / brain dump (retrieval practice) | High utility |
| Spaced repetition flashcard apps | High utility |
| Pomodoro timers | Not directly studied — helps focus, not learning itself |
| Study-with-me videos | Not directly studied — accountability tool, not a technique |
Parent advice
Redirect the effort, don't ban the trend. If your child enjoys making beautiful notes, let the note-making be a quick first pass, then spend the bulk of the session testing recall from memory or reviewing spaced flashcards — the same content, a fraction of the low-value time.
See also our related guide on how to practise for the 11+ for a fuller walkthrough of applying retrieval practice and spacing to actual 11+ subjects.
Frequently asked questions
Does highlighting help my child revise for the 11+?
The research evidence rates highlighting and underlining as low utility. It can create a false sense of familiarity with material without building the kind of memory retrieval strength that predicts exam performance. It's best used as a quick first pass, not the main revision activity.
What is spaced repetition and does it work for 11+ prep?
Spaced repetition means spreading study of the same material across several short sessions over time, rather than one long session. It is one of the two techniques rated highest-utility in the major research review on learning techniques (Dunlosky et al., 2013), and works well for vocabulary, facts and reasoning practice typical of the 11+.
Are study-with-me videos actually useful for 11+ revision?
They aren't a learning technique in themselves — they weren't part of the research review on study techniques — but they can genuinely help some children start and sustain a study session through ambient accountability. What's studied during that time still matters more than the format.
What's the single most evidence-backed change a parent can make to 11+ revision?
Replacing rereading notes with self-testing from memory (retrieval practice), and spreading sessions out over several days rather than cramming. These are the two techniques with the strongest research support across a wide range of subjects and ages.
Sources
Primary and official sources this guide is checked against — confirm the current detail against these before you rely on it.
- Dunlosky, Rawson, Marsh, Nathan & Willingham (2013), plain-English summary — American Educator
- Dunlosky et al. (2013), full paper — Psychological Science in the Public Interest
- Association for Psychological Science — Which Study Strategies Make the Grade?
Related SharpY Mind resources
Retrieval practice, built in by design
SharpY Mind's practice sessions are structured around active recall and spaced review — the two techniques the research actually backs — not passive rereading.
⚡ Try SharpY Mind free